Europe has a wolf problem, and a late Norwegian philosopher had the solution
theconversation.com
theconversation.com
Philosophy of Wolf Policies I: General Principles and Preliminary Exploration of Selected Norms
1. Wolves kill wild animals. This is a good thing, nature doing its work and we have a problem for example with uncontrollably growing boar polulation.
2. Wolves kill sheep.
Major problem for sheep owners. Need expensive fencing. I think if they can get inside a fence they will not kill only one and be happy with it. They will kill as many as the can (needs source though).
3. Wolves kill reindeer. Major problem for the owners, you cant really fence them in.
4. Wolves kill dogs. This happens occasionally in Sweden.
But in the end it is a democracy problem. Most people live in cities but they are not affected by wolves. Who should decide?
Or is it the wolves that should decide as i think Naess, a bit cowardly IMO, argues?
For instance, in France the government will pay the value of the animal, plus compensation for stress caused to the herd, plus any vet costs, plus compensation for any damages to fences. So much so that the system is abused.
But this is not the point here. The point is to learn to co-exist with the natural world instead of destroying anything we don't like or profit from.
Sheep farmers breed sheep for slaughter. I don't think the death of a sheep is particularly sentimental to them.
Or they can get guard dog who will deter almost all wolves unless they are starving
Anyway if wolves were starving there are other issues in the ecosystem that need to be addressed.
Delusional city people making laws trampling economic minorities like farmers, can make all the laws they want but what happens on the ground might be very different.
I think that is logical? Prey normally is in the open and will run away. Killing a few more makes sense because the wolf can come back later to eat again. Only because of the fence the prey cannot flee and therefore all will be killed. And the next day the owner will remove all the dead.
Doesn't the prey of the wolf share the same right? If so, which claim is superior? Isn't a better position that the wolf contributes to a healthy ecosystem, as was found when they were reintroduced to Yellowstone?
https://www.geographyrealm.com/wolf-reintroduction-yellowsto...
'It may also play an effective role in countering the often-baseless fear and hysteria around wolves (Næss blamed the brothers Grimm for the animals’ bad public image).'
Proper care of wild wolves must involve vaccination for rabies, as 78% of attacks on humans involved infection.
https://wolf.org/wolf-info/factsvsfiction/are-wolves-dangero...
Without predators deer/boar/etc populations explode and need controlling through hunting. This is exactly why hunters are unhappy where wolves have come back: the wolves eat the animals the hunters want to shoot.
Humans kill deer for sport, wolves kill to eat them. Also wolves have a very positive effect on the ecosystem as whole. Just look up what happened in Yellowstone (of course you won’t)..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotka%E2%80%93Volterra_equatio...
https://sites.google.com/site/biologydarkow/ecology/predator...
It is a bit tricky to find the interesting combinations of the settings
Venison, venisoff. As Mr. Miyagi never said.
Also (unless your comment is sarcasm/trolling) you do know that somebody has to kill those deer anyway (why is it any better if humans do it for sport) to avoid unsustainable population explosion
Not it’s not. They have already disappeared. Modern industrial farming has little to do with what people have been doing there for millennia. You can blame tractors, fertilizers, pesticides etc. for destroying traditional farming communities.
Anyway, not that relevant because saying that wolves pose a existential threat to farmers is silly. The insignificant damage they case can be mitigated by using fencing, guards dogs etc. in combination with compensations provides by the state.
That's not how these communities themselves see it. They've adopted this technologies, and they haven't adopted wolves.