1. That revision was done by Moore himself
2. It is the version of the law everyone understands as Moore's Law today and the one Intel is referring to here
3. They are not revising an error like Moore did
Otherwise, I'd agree. If this redefining of Moore's Law held over the next 30 years, became the commonly understood definition, and then they extended it from 3 to 4 years, I'd say the same thing again.
And here is another thing I have been saying since 2020.[1]
>In the past 3 years all major PR has twisted the word "Moore's Law" to just meant transistor improvement.
I wrote that in 2022 and was downvoted to oblivion.
It is sad we often have to debate about simple "facts". Only years later could we only accept it as truth.