The era of American computer magazines has drawn to a close
bytecellar.com
bytecellar.com
I didn’t care about the membrane keyboard. Or the tape cassette inputs. Or the crashing from the 16k ram pack. It was a computer, and it was mine. And I started applying all that Byte knowledge.
I barely attended college, and didn’t need to. Byte, and its lesser sisters was a far better education for me.
This was a foundational time for and probably millions of future engineers. I wish I could go back to that time ;-)
I hadn't thought of this in a long time before your comment reminded me.
It's very sad to realise that that feeling is never going to come back.
But what I looked forward to most was the included CDs. They would contain so many software, trial wares, free wares, game packs, screensavers, Winamp skins. It was like being a kid in a candy store.
Then came Linux for you, and made me try my first Linux distro - xandros 2003. Then there was the complete 3 DVD Debian distro on LFY made me create an openmpi HPC in college among so many other things completely ignored by the formal education system.
I think there is a real value to limited, quality information like these magazines that the internet ruined. Devs these days have unlimited information at their fingertips - the internet and now chatgpt. But now the onus is on us - are we asking the right questions?
You raise a good question about drowning in the flood of info on the internet. The lack of gatekeepers has upsides as well as downsides. One of those downsides is the lack of quality control. The Linux and computing magazines in India were very high quality and they got a lot of people interested in computing.
"Used over and over till they were tired and torn. Like a broken clock that can't tell time. Like a thick ass book that's filled with wack rhymes."
My first exposure to programming in the early 80s was copying in a BASIC game from some magazine. I read Byte Magazine for Steve Ciarcia's Circuit Cellar and dreamed of buying an IBM compatible. Dr Dobbs Journal was just an incredible eye opener into the world of serious compute science / engineering , particularly Mike Abrashs column on 3D - it was a black art - and a series on implementing unix.
It was great to see Linux Format and game mags in the early 00s, but I guess all good things evolve. Back then we would have wanted infinite information at our fingertips, one device to be a camera, mp3 player and phone all-in-one .. and flat screens that you could lift with one hand, so Im not complaining.
I do worry that young people just see the magic, and dont learn how things actually work under the hood .. I think Scratch and Minecraft are wonderful in this regard because you get to construct things yourself.
If we humans can build all these amazing things .. theres a chance we'll get our collective shit together and address climate change.
It’s okay to have nostalgia for those times and still appreciate what we have now.
It’s a great point how we would have swapped that for this at that point of time.
I didn't start writing COBOL and FORTRAN programs on punched cards for the IBM 3081 mainframe until I got into college, in the fall of 1984.
I still want to know when we are going to get our Transputers that can run machine language code from any architecture of CPU, because even their microcode can be rewritten in software on the fly -- beyond what we can do with FPGAs.
If you want innovation, then create a market incentive for it. But that requires pushing bills that would wreck the prospects of oil companies, and cause trillions of stranded assets, so they lobby against it.
The general public seems pretty opposed to higher fossil fuel prices.
The reason for climate change isn't a lack of technical innovation. We have ALL the innovations to change things. The reason for climate change is short-sighted greed, and a lack of political will, not a lack of scientific or technological capability.
Advertising is cancer.
There are more than enough maniacs who would love nothing better than being allowed to put the pedal to the metal whenever they feel like it, and who don't give a damn about other peoples safety and lives be damned.
There are also people who would like to live in a society where they are allowed to hit (or do worse things to) anyone that annoys them for whatever reason.
There are people who think slavery is a great idea, or who think women should be subservient to men.
It's a bit sad, I've enjoyed them. The articles were well written when compared to average online articles about hardware.
But there's little point today in reading the news a few days or weeks after they happen.
Most people are into instant gratification, they want to hear the news, they aren't interested in the overall experience of reading an article, they don't care about author's point, they don't care about learning new things.
People just want to know in an instant how shinier is the latest iPhone when compared to the old one, how much does it cost and when they can get it. And a random online news outlet or random YouTube channel is enough for that.
We are not just experiencing the demise of PC magazines, but also the demise of printed press and of major old news outlets.
A guy with an YouTube channel or TikTok can have a greater audience than a former newspaper or magazine.
I have the impression that nowadays most people no longer want to invest the time to read in-depth articles or books on a topic. Myself, I recently read a couple of technical books and came to the conclusion that a good technical book is still worth it. It explores a topic in a structured way and in-depth, and the information in a technical book is supposed to have been reviewed. If you read good technical blogs, you can pick up a couple of things here and there, but I think it will never be as efficient as reading a good technical book on a specific topic.
I am also reading Pro ASP.NET Core 7. I am not new to ASP.NET Core, but was surprised to learn some new things from the book.
C# In a Nutshell still is worth it's weight IMHO.
The docs are often limited to autogenerated API with some surface level remarks.
I have to total opposite view. I only want to read the news like after at least a couple of days, so that there is time for things to become clear. The CNN kind of "breaking news" looping the whole day in "latest developments" is stupid since there is usually nothing to talk about but rumors and "experts" guessing or pushing some murky agenda.
I'm glad that era is gone. It took too long to learn. When I went to my cousins in Pakistan who had internet, he showed me Yahoo (google wasn't a thing yet) and the very first thing I searched for was File Formats, and there was an entire website that shows the format of every file with full details. I almost cried on how easy it was vs. how much hard I had to work.
Then the Internet arrived for me in 1993 and suddenly everything I needed was right there. I feel you!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Playboy#Online-only
There are lots of great niche magazines out there still printing if you have the money. I run a magazine encyclopedia so I see a lot of things coming across my screen and I'm actually floored by the number of magazines still printing.
(OP posted it in a different comment.)
(Of course in reality, more people are watching you on the internet.)
Semiconductors
Tractor-trailer maintenance
Wedding venues
Private investigators
"This is a great chance to give a shout-out to the Trade Journal Cooperative https://www.tradejournalcooperative com/ -- not web sites, but it actually delivers paper magazines from interesting industry verticals. Everything from bowling alleys to semiconductors. Also, the covering letter from the editor is wryly observed and usually witty." https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34096833
Are you affiliated?
————
Fall 2023 - Plastics Business
Summer 2023 - randomly, either Trenchless Technology or Compact Equipment
Spring 2023 - ?
Winter 2023 - BUSRide and BUSRide Maintenance (double-header)
Fall 2022 - Semiconductor Digest
Summer 2022 - Church Executive
Spring 2022 - Bowlers Journal International
Winter 2022 - VenuesNow
Fall 2021 - FleetOwner
Summer 2021 - National Fitness Trade Journal
Spring 2021 - Trains
Winter 2021 - Quality Assurance and Food Safety
Fall 2020 - Ratchet and Wrench
Summer 2020 - Genii
Spring 2020 - PI Magazine
I started by reading BYTE Magazine cover to cover, in 1980, when I found it at the local library. It was a foreign language that I acquired, slowly, by immersion. I was twelve years old.
I was a BYTE subscriber in 1999, when they abruptly ceased publication. The new owners switched my subscription to "PC Magazine", I believe. I sent them a note to the effect that BYTE had covered the whole industry, not just Windows-compatible machines, and they could donate the pro-rated price on the subscription remaining to the beer fund for the BYTE staff that had had no warning that the ace was about to fall.
It's hard to build a culture, a cadre of writers and editors, with ad-hoc contributors to online sites. I subscribed to Ars Technica, Phoronix, and lwn.net with the lunch money I had left over as the year draws to a close. Please consider supporting such institutions, if you can. Every bit helps.
Before the internet, before BBSes and before floppy disks, magazines were the way programs were distributed in the late 70s and early 80s. You would type in the BASIC source code printed in magazines to give yourself something new to run.
Just browsing the archive.org's collection brought back so many memories… like this one when the Steve Jobs launched NeXT [1].
[1]: https://archive.org/embed/NeXTWORLDVol.1No.1JanuaryFebruary1...
Over the past few years, as magazines have gone from print to online-only, I've subscribed to some of them via Zinio ( https://www.zinio.com ). They carry PCWorld, Maximum PC, Macworld, MacLife, and more. Their "reader" is nice, but I do wish it supported downloading the magazines as PDFs.
One magazine that is available in print and online is MagPi magazine ( https://magpi.raspberrypi.com ). Its emphasis is on Raspberry Pi. You can download back issues for free, and the print version is often available at bookstores such as B&N.
Stuff like Byte was both deep, entertaining, well written and forward looking.
Internet media never got to the same heights as printed media did when it comes to editing and packaging quality.
That's not to say there haven't been great heights on the net too, as it allowed for new ways to communicate about technology (think https://ciechanow.ski/ great content and many more).
I don't really care if I already knew the news as covered, it's much more I like to read their opinions on said news, I love the random stories from the "Real World Computing" section, and their reviews are a decent starting point when I'm considering something or asked to recommend, also giving an insight in to all sorts of areas I may otherwise not pay any attention to.
edit: Also, I worked computer fairs every weekend back in the day, all over the North - Cheshire, Aintree, North Wales, Bradford/Leeds. Those were great times!
Then my public library started offering PressReader access for free (well, local property taxes notwithstanding). So, much like Spotify, I basically have a subscription to every magazine on Earth now.
Interestingly, while I used to read stacks and stacks of print magazines back in the day, I very rarely think to even pull up PressReader. When I do, I just skim here and there for a few minutes before closing the app and doing something else.
Digital magazines just don't FEEL like magazines, in the way that actual print magazines used to. They feel like blogs, from the pre-social media era when the Internet was still mostly long-form writing. I don't know if this really says something about the decline of magazines, or my own personal cognitive or attention-span decline after ~15 years of social media consumption.
At the time this news came out, I thought PopSci was just no longer publishing on paper, but turns out even the digital magazine model isn't exciting enough to sustain itself sometimes.
If you ever visit London, I highly recommend the MagCulture store. They also have a nice podcast: https://magculture.com/blogs/podcast
It’s definitely not the “default” like it used to be, though.
Every magazine, no matter how good the quality, has annoyances on their sites - cookie notices, newsletter sign ups, having to even log in, ads even for subscribers.
For the two magazines I like to read in print (NYRB, LRB), even the ads are useful (mostly new books).
I've got the Byte cover with the computer watch, into which is being inserted a tiny floppy disk. I do NOT have an Apple watch, but that's what I think of when the Apple watch crosses my mind, is that Byte magazine cover.
We got there technically. Now, to rediscover the spirit of those days, when we imagined the future, shared, and found inspiration.
It was utterly underwhelming. The writing was ok, but each issue was maybe an an equivalent of 1-2 days worth of hackaday.com articles and nowhere as detailed as personal blogs (think "sprites mods"). This means that most issues will have at most one interesting article, or maybe none.
I would love to support the physical media, but it is simply not interesting enough.
It started off clean, then a couple of months later it had a small 'adult' section, and then each month after that the 'adult' section got bigger and bigger that the magazine got reclassified as a adult mag. (I never brought this mag)
I've never read byte in dead tree format but read it online at archive.org and am really grateful to the person(s) who have scanned it and uploaded it. The quality of articles are amazing and it's understandable how the early era of home microcomputers grew like wildfire, or was it all the low hanging fruit that Brian Kernighan talks about.
My biggest regret was buying Amiga Power (games) magazine as a kid in the early 90s instead of Amiga Format/CU Amiga, as the latter had assembler, AmigaE and music tracker tutorials.
Also there is some US website by a Ham Radio guy which also has a bunch of scans on it of early US publications which are great to read
Maybe I’m getting old and curmudgeonly, but there’s nothing fun in computing anymore. If you check out IA and read old copies of Byte or CC, we were all looking forward to the next tech improvement, maybe a 5 MB hard disk that didn’t cost as much as a car, or a printer that finally worked. Maybe sharing a bit of BASIC or assembler code. Is that next computer from Atari going to beat the new Apple II?
These days, eh. Who’s looking forward to anything?
My wife disagrees.
Is she right?
Reading natgeo was a dream—-I bought used copies roadside in the bylanes of Kolkata.
Once in a while my SO questions the same. I change the topic and continue to cherish the collection.
Great for old books that you don’t want taking up space. But, don’t want to lose completely either.
It's not technically live yet, but there's a couple of test pages up:
https://en.magazedia.wiki/cinefex-no-138
https://en.magazedia.wiki/gq-style-usa-summer-2017
I have something in the order of probably 2 million magazines in various electronic formats that I am working up organizing and uploading.
Even in the infantile form of the web where this sort of knowledge and editorial transfer of ideas really ought to have thrived, there was no digital compendium even remotely close to how dense and concisely curated these pages were. It really felt like every new issue was unlocking the next level of the game as the Internet was developing..
I still go to my local Barnes & Noble, the last one remaining in Seattle, to get my 2600 (and a coffee!) every quarter. Why B&N? No other bookstore in the city sells 2600, at least not reliably.
It's been a quarterly ritual for quite some time, even though I could just get a "lifetime" subscription and have more Hacker Quarterly pages to read than I could do in an actual lifetime. I still enjoy going and getting a paper magazine and reading spill about central offices and script code injection.
I formerly had a subscription to 2600, but canceled it after realizing it was sold at B&N, which surprised me. Not that B&N chose to sell it, but that I could reliably find it in every location I visit. In my head, that meant 2600, a publication I actually care about, was getting exposure to curious minds, and that was important to me. So, I figured buying one at B&N was like me casting my vote that they should continue to carry it for the benefit of a future budding computer enthusiast.
B&N, while corporate so to speak, is also the last major gasp of fighting the Amazon hegemony. I root for them to succeed.
Here in San Antonio, there are at least three if not four B&N. I know SA has a higher population than Seattle but hearing you only have one is surprising to me.
I go once or twice a month to browse around, occasionally buy a magazine or stationery. The other day during holiday shopping, both locations in my area were quite busy at the register.
I'm glad I was able to have the experience of producing print magazines--it's a unique line of work, for sure, and I think when I'm older I'll reminisce on this point in my career.
Oh man, exactly the same. There must be millions of us. [Added: Wikipedia claims "By 1982, an estimated 621,000 home computers were in American households", which might not be up to date with Christmas, but still looks like a no.]
(I started reading Byte in 1981, though. By the late 80s the best years for the magazines were clearly past.)
It must have affected everyone minus the newest generation who learned all about computing online..
I find the Magazine and the writers very professional but I cannot say it's worth for me to buy the Magazine nowadays.
Later on, I contributed some articles to it. Don’t know if it is still going.
Some of their writers went on to create Rock Paper Shotgun which was one of the best blogs out there.
Nowadays, the people who would've subscribed to computer magazines go online. PC Magazine and PC World moved online and it worked very well for them.
There's far more online, but also misinformation.
I've often wondered about this. I grew up loving computer magazines, trusting everything they published. Was there actually more credibility with the information back then, or did it have more to do with the fact that far fewer "sources" had the ability to disseminate information (good or bad) and there was a natural system of checks and balances about what got published? We tended to believe what appeared in print because we assumed the info was verified before ink hit the page. These days, of course, we know better than to just blindly trust sources, but still get tricked into doing so anyway.
I have no answers on this, I guess, but it is something worth thinking about.
And that's likely the reason it still exists. I don't think WIRED really survived the dot-com bubble popping.
I skimmed the online list of articles for the past few months and it does look better (but not 1993-1997 high water mark, or 1997-2021 still ok). There have been two different editors in chief since 2021, maybe that was a factor.
It's would be hard for them to maintain the kind of techo-optimism they had in their early years, without sounding delusional, given what we've learned since.
Wired's so-called "review" of Hogwarts Legacy is an abomination. <https://www.wired.com/review/hogwarts-legacy-review/>
PS - Check out the author's other works for the magazine.