When the punishment for the thing is effectively 0, you dont understand why people are more likely to do the thing?
If speeding tickets were reduced to 0, do you think more or less or exactly the same amount of people would speed?
If speeding tickets were reduced to 0, do you think more or less or exactly the same amount of people would speed?
You're making several bad assumptions that nullify whatever point you were trying to make: that the punishment is the only thing that controls how often someone violates the law (other factors include culture and internal morals); that the punishment is "effectively 0"; and that the converse of "much more likely" is not "no difference".