This seems sensible but I'm not sure it's going to be much simpler than git/GitHub.
The syntax is quite close to git's --word-diff syntax
The [-old-]{+new+} word is betterThe syntax is quite close to git's --word-diff syntax
The [-old-]{+new+} word is betterA proper vcs for documentation is what Wikipedia does.
You always see the latest version of a document and you can see the changes to that document, revert and follow renames.
No global history, no commits of multiple files, no manual pull/push, no branches, no CI, no pr, no rewrite of history, no multiple remotes, etc etc etc
I think this is not git problem, rather diff tool it's using? Wonder if using another one, e.g. difftastic[1] would be a better experience.
The PR/MR is the biggest win, being able to comment on, discuss, suggest, resolve and 'sign off' changes works better in a PR/MR than any other versioned tool I've seen.
I’m not sure using git is any more or less difficult than suggestions.