In short, patents, like people, offices and other "assets" are managed using enterprise software.
I would assume that it's pretty easy for a company to take a set of claims/wording (ie, patents asserted in Yahoo's suit) and search using their systems against a corpus of both internal (patents, etc) and external sources (case findings and news - ie, like Lexis Nexus) the best fits to meet a given "need" - either the company is being sued, filing suit, or in this case, helping an ally/customer (note: Microsoft also owns an not-insignificant chunk of Facebook).
Sometimes I can't help but feel that most lawyers do not much more than present an obfuscation layer around standard forms.
Sometimes I can't help but feel that most lawyers do not
much more than present an obfuscation layer around
standard forms.
I bet non-technical people also have that feeling about engineers."It took you a second to change the behavior of this. You're obviously not working very hard." ..when in reality, it took a lot of effort to make a system flexible enough to adapt its behavior quickly to changes in requirements.
...but I'm getting off topic now. :)
Its not about how much a lawyer costs, its about how much they make you.