I think a lot of people drop any wrong information. It's a waste of time to think about wrong information.

This comic presents a scenario where someone believes wrong information: git branches have rules. Git branches do not in fact have rules. This is wrong information. Why would we talk about wrong information?

We talk about wrong information because other people do not have up to date and correct information. We can try to just update their information to be correct, but that does not always work. In some cases they have built a structure of reasoning based on their belief. It is traumatic to destroy this structure of reasoning without providing a replacement.

Thus it can be helpful to understand the bad reasoning (based on wrong information) in order to communicate more effectively.