I love how y'all keep trying to make nuclear happen. Then it turns out to cost too many billions and too many decades with too many shitty failure modes and we enter another quiet cycle of aggressive forgetting.
... in all seriousness, it would be a lot more useful to compare what a developed country has been able to achieve.. even more useful is the country you're talking about.
oh look - here you go:
https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/how-much-does-it-cost-t...
http://euanmearns.com/how-long-does-it-take-to-build-a-nucle...
Which confirms your statement, they are a practical people. They have despite much lower labor costs than in the western world and a dictatorial safety and decision making culture come to the conclusion that renewables will power the vast majority of the grid.
This doesn't mean nuclear is a mistake per se, but if the central government decides nuclear is practical, and it turns out they are wrong, it's very probable they keep building them and then some well after they are costing more money than they produce. In the US the investors would go bankrupt, and the plant development abandoned.
Large parts of Western Europe have been using nuclear energy since the 70s without problem. There will be difficulties, of course: the plants are growing old and drought does affect nuclear energy production.