The NYT prompted it with sections of copyright articles to get it to reproduce the rest of the copyrighted article. Which is pretty clearly deliberately trying to get it to reproduce a copyright article.
Note I fully agree that OpenAI should acquire the appropriate licenses to use all of the content it uses to train its models. However I'm not as clear on whether anybody should be able to place limits on or modulate/attenuate the output once the input has been appropriately licensed and responsibly consumed.
> Which is pretty clearly deliberately trying to get it to reproduce a copyright article.
Not reproduce. Recall.