Because of the long lead time for aircraft and financial commitment, many airlines will place large orders and take delivery of aircraft that they then turn around and sell or lease.
Because of the long lead time for aircraft and financial commitment, many airlines will place large orders and take delivery of aircraft that they then turn around and sell or lease.
Or because the defect in engine inlets and anti-ice systems that can cause the engine housing to overheat and break off during flight, for which Boeing requested an exemption to postpone fixes, is different for each model number?
Or because each model has different pressurization systems and warning lights, that Alaska Airlines "reset" to turn off the light so they could continue to fly, instead of thoroughly investigating and resolving?
Or because not all the models have the same door plug with a loose bolt that blew out?
How much is common among all Max models, and why shouldn't the public be concerned about all variants of them?
Interestingly, the sealed door only relies on a bunch of bolts to hold it against cabin pressure.
https://twitter.com/NTSB_Newsroom/status/1744202059870831016...
I'm more interested in the continuing drumbeat of engineering failures, quality control lapses, apparent corner cutting and evasion of regulation that affect various Max models.
If I have a choice, I'll choose an airline that doesn't have any Max planes in their fleet.
If you want airlines that are flying 737 Max 9, there aren't many. And you can get that list here.
https://www.planespotters.net/aircraft/production/boeing-737...
Lion Air
Thai Lion Air
United Airlines
Copa Airlines
FlyDubai
Icelandair
Turkish Airlines
Aeromexico
Alaska Airlines
SCAT airlines
And all US carriers + Turkish Air + Aeromexico have grounded it.