I am not against bug hunting by any means, but if you want to me act like I care about your product and not about my money, pay me monthly.
I am not against bug hunting by any means, but if you want to me act like I care about your product and not about my money, pay me monthly.
You don’t make HackerOne your primary source of security testing. It’s a fun thing you do in addition to your formal security work internally.
The reason people do it is because so many people expect or even demand payment and public recognition for submitting security issues they found. Just look at how many comments in this thread are insisting that they pay the author various amounts of money. The blog post even has a line about how they have not provided recognition (despite being posted exactly on the day it was fixed, giving the company almost no time to actually do so).
HackerOne style programs provide a way to formalize this, publicize the rules (e.g we pay $25K for privilege escalation or something) and give recognition to people finding the bugs.
Pentesters like it not only because they get paid, but now they can point to their record on a public website.
This isn’t a “gig economy bad” situation.
I have never found out if this is a side gig, a full-time job, or a hobby for people.
The reason most people have converged on a preference for salaried work is that most jobs don't actually need consistency to be useful, but most people do need consistent pay to focus on a job