Monopoly really is a nasty game, it amplifies the worst aspects of human nature.
Monopoly really is a nasty game, it amplifies the worst aspects of human nature.
“The history of Monopoly can be traced back to 1903, when American anti-monopolist Lizzie Magie created a game that she hoped would explain the single-tax theory of Henry George. It was intended as an educational tool, to illustrate the negative aspects of concentrating land in private monopolies. She took out a patent in 1904. Her game, The Landlord's Game, was self-published, beginning in 1906.”
Nothing about Monopoly has stealing or hiding or gloating, though. Your family is not locked in here with Monopoly. Monopoly is locked in here with your family.
I'll say though that your experience might be in line with how the original game was intended. It was supposed to teach people about the evils of large-scale land grabbing.
Why play a game unless the aim is to win—even with family? It's like playing poker, it's a game of one upmanship, such behavior helps deflate the ego of one's opponent which can change his/her decisions to one's advantage.
I'm not a psychologist or behavioral expert so I'm unable to make any authoritative comment about why my family would behave differently to perhaps, say, yours.
I don't see anything about the game itself that would lead myself or anyone I know to lie and cheat.
Monopoly really is a nasty game, because it models the nasty aspects of capitalism/markets + human nature quite well, I guess.
See wiki article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly_(game)