Is this actually affiliated with Roger Penrose? Seems extraordinarily rude to use his name otherwise. Was his permission sought? In fact, this may be seen as "passing off" in English law.
Especially given the clear linkage with code references: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Apenrose%2Fpenrose%20roger... - it seems more personal than Diagram/Graphical Notation/Tiling/Stairs/Triangle etc.
To simply borrow his name is indeed, I think, in pretty poor taste. The trend of naming unrelated products after scientists and inventors (from "Tesla" and "Nikola," to Theranos' "Edison," to "Ada Lovelace," and so forth,) has become unbelievably low-effort and cringe.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose
There's enough other Penroses to choose from; sir Roger doesn't own the (sur)name.
I doubt this would come to court. The main problem is the temerity of using the name of a living person in this way. But, they could have sought permission, in which case, all is well.
Mathematical Physics :)
As a British national, I always called that category of cleaning device "hoovers": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hoover_Company
I'm sufficiently nerdy to think "Sphere" whenever the name Dyson comes up, but I'm sure that to most normal people even "Dyson sphere" will mean one of these rather than a K2 civilisation: https://www.dyson.co.uk/vacuum-cleaners/uprights/ball-animal...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_things_named_after_Rog...
It's one thing to use the name of a historical figure, quite another to use the recognisable mark of a living person.
Of course, it could all be being done with endorsement, in which case, my comment is invalid, but otherwise it's incredibly rude and a borderline civil tort.