Since this plane was built last year, I’m assuming they know who was responsible for tightening the bolts and inspections.
A journalist needs to bluntly ask if they’ve been fired. If they haven’t, it’s all lip service.
A journalist needs to bluntly ask if they’ve been fired. If they haven’t, it’s all lip service.
That's exactly the wrong way to deal with the issue...
I’ve got a feeling that would not have been the approach when Boeing was at its best. Heads would have rolled.
If both failed at their jobs there's something a bit more smelly than just "individual responsibility" going on in an industry where process is extremely important for safety, don't you agree?
Fire the wrench holder and declare it fixed?
Instead of performative scapegoating, we should be asking how it’s possible that there is no documentation showing critical steps were done correctly.
Done and dusted, the angels in management hunted down the demon with the spanner that couldn't be bothered to do his job. He's probably just doing donuts in his lambo the cheeky beggar.
Also time doesn’t matter, they should have named records for the lifespan of the plane. Everything else is just destruction of evidence. We need every culprit of the 500+ deaths, or else Boeing has not improved a bit in quality.
fire the ceo. fire all the managers in the chain that were warned of issues, and asked employees to hide those by making false documentation.
and bar them, for life, to work in anything that has lives that can be put at risk.