Hacker News Reader

HNHacker News

Top New Best Ask Show Jobs

Comment by hammock | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

hammock·

>That is an extremely specific situation!

It’s an example. Can you generalize it or should I?

View on HN

Here's a hypothetical for a two-stairwell building: two couches.

We can avoid this dangerous scenario with a three-stairwell minimum requirement.

Good point. Why do we even bother with two-lane roads and a double yellow line? Such a waste of space. Very contrived to presume there is always a car coming the other way

Sorry, but the only thing that will change my mind is a significantly casualty different between single stairwell and dual-stairwell buildings accounting for building age, construction type, property value, and occupant demographics.

Happy to hear evidence-based arguments.

The US would certainly be a nicer place to live if there were more roads with just one lane, like many older cities and suburbs already have.

You're comparing a situation that happens all the time (opposing traffic) with one that happens extremely rarely (blocked stairwell in a fire). If anything, you're strengthening my point.

We should design for situations to a level that is appopriate given their frequency and severity. Show me evidence that MANDATING the extra stairwell justifies the huge increase in national housing cost, and I'll concede.

Why would you need two lanes in each direction, except perhaps on a highway..? I agree, such a waste of space.

I just dont think it would really help that often. It is not the stairwells that are burning, it is some appartment on a floor below. Your problem is going to be smoke and visibility, not some couch blocking the stair. If those stairs are connected, you will most likely have smoke everywhere and will have no clue if one stair is safer than the other.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com