> The funny thing about all this is that (perhaps this case aside) Google is getting a lot of bad PR because they actually tell people what they do.
Surely you jest? This story goes back 4-5 years ago. People have such short memories. [p.s.: missed the "aside".]
http://epic.org/privacy/streetview/#timeline
> Meanwhile, everyone .. facebook .. Target ..
Facebook's very provenance is a matter of double dealing, lies, and thievery. I expect precisely zero degree of ethical and moral rectitude from that company. I have never used it and never will unless literally forced at gun point.
Target (and other merchants): Rest assured I was never convinced that giving merchant x a track-me green light was worth saving a few bucks here and there.
I expected so much more from Google and the people working for Google.
I deeply regret the necessity to post the links below (and single out this one individual), but clearly $omething happen$ to otherwise (and previously) aware, concerned, and '"sword" wielding' engineers and scientists when they get sucked into Google's vortex:
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~daw/papers/privacy-compcon97-www...
https://twitter.com/#!/eric_brewer/status/68051541063503872
(What happened, Dr. Brewer? You seemed to have an informed clue in 1997 ...)
It really makes you wonder. I guess we are all human, after all.
> Your privacy is being violated all the time, constantly, and nobody tells you about it. If you care so much about the ethics of recording traffic from open wifi networks, then I hope you also pick up your sword against the massive tide of less obvious and more directly nefarious privacy violations.
Whenever I get a chance. You bet. And I am not giving up either, and neither should you. (Do you have children? Think about the future world you are preparing as inheritance for them. Specially if you are a geek.)