Essentially we need to get fundamentals first.
Then apply the knowledge and get challenged (feedback loop) -> build a project, play in front of others, speak the language.
Improve - not by force, but by understanding (remembering something and understanding something are two different things).
Synthesise - learn about a topic in a different manner or try to find similar concepts in completely different context /
Use mentors to amplify the knowledge and get feedback quicker.
Immerse yourself in practicality (work in a field, live in a country etc.)
Sometimes, you just know a thing or don't, and for me, spaced repetition cards helped a ton with the static things you just have to memorize (or derive). Knowing definitions is important—you're absolutely right that it's just one piece of the puzzle though.
EDIT: The exams at the end of high school can be considered standardized tests, but they are taken at your own school, graded by your own teacher and only verified by the national test organisation. They are not multiple-choice tests.
why not. Its not exactly rote learning like a parrot. You just learn tricks and patterns in problems. Tests usually have a limited amount of patterns.
OTOH, you are not supposed to solve every problem in the exam, so perhaps you can get the best grade even if you skip all the problems where there's no pattern to apply. In that case, that's a loop hole which the exam creators should plug.
Can you link me to finnish high school question that is asking for 'sketch a proof to a given (simple) lemma you've never proved before '
I agree that this cannot be rote learnt .
Fall 2023: "Prove that 2^12345678910 - 1 is divisible by 1023."
Spring 2022: "Using induction, show that the sum of the numbers on the line n of Pascal's triangle equals 2^n."
Here's the full exam from fall 2023: https://yle.fi/plus/abitreenit/2023/syksy/matematiikka_pitka...
That is indeed a tough proof to solve sight unseen. Any reason you say that students are seeing that question for the first time in the test. Seems like a famous questions, even chatgpt got the proof correctly .
The high school curriculum and the text books are not focused on proofs or famous questions. Further, the goal of the exam is to find out your position in the normal distribution of your peers' math skills. You are not supposed to be able to beat everyone else by rote learning (so if you can do it, it's quite a hack!).
I don't think ChatGPT is a good comparison, because it has obviously memorized much more than a human could, and a test to poke its strengths and weaknesses would look different.