Market warping commodity monopolies are rare, due to regulation. Proving them takes a lot more than a neo-communist rant. Modern monopolies are most often predicated on IP. Protecting them is protection of the global market for their goods, which in turn protects the all-important trade-balance as well as GDP. IP protection is not cartelization / price fixing.
>Because I'm not putting in more effort if my counterpart refuses to
You responded to me by inventing a strawman argument and then basing a rhetorical question on it that, in turn, justifies itself by assuming the strawman. I'm not your counterpart nor did I ask you to participate. Your particiaption should be self-evidently valuable if you want to be considered a participant in a debate. Your mode of response was not valid. Ie: if you respond to a statement with a false strawman and a question that assumes that it is correct, then expect that to be called out.
> I'm not going to dignify the "economically globalist society" part with a response
No one asked you for a response. I could care less if you respond, but will point out the flaws in your response if you do.
Incresing internal wealth is always predicated on importation of foreign currency. This is why sanctions work to impoverish nations, in spite of possession of valuable items like oil. Nations can sell their production internally all they like. They'll remain third world hellholes without an export market.