I abhor graebers writing,but this conclusion is reasonable. "The entire framework of society" I think the point is, that the entire framework of society developed to enrich people who are already rich. Palace and Temple economies wouldn't have existed if they didn't raid and ultimately conquer their agrarian neighbors. Surely there's a social framework that doesn't require violence? If there isn't, shouldn't there be?

>Anarchist writers always seem unable to grasp this. >Obviously I haven't read, like, a majority of anarchist writing.

hmmmmm