Hacker News Reader

Comment by toomuchtodo | Hacker News Reader

Login.gov exists so you have one login across all federal agencies. Why would you hate this? It is more efficient and a better UX for consumers of digital government services. Admittedly, there will be some rough edges during this transition from disparate idps or legacy private corp identity providers, but the end state will be improved.

View on HN

Cause it's not used across all federal agencies. There are a bunch of separate ones still.

So the argument against not implementing it is... it's not implemented everywhere?

It's this classic: https://xkcd.com/927/ There's already ID.me. Why add a new thing?

Because ID.me is a for profit company, and Login.gov is accountable to citizens as a GSA product. We swap out suboptimal solutions for more optimal solutions as the situation dictates.

I get the desire to upgrade, and I'm guessing there's a good reason the ID.me logins can't be migrated to Login.gov. But it's very rare and unsettling for login method and creds to change on a site. I've pretty much only seen that on govt websites... and botched Microsoft acquisitions. So there should be a high bar for this, and I hope Login.gov is really the last time.

> So there should be a high bar for this, and I hope Login.gov is really the last time.

Me too.

Because the part of ID.me that says

> I accept the ID.me Terms of Service and Privacy Policy *

I absolutely do not and will not. Their terms are a load of BS. Horrible terms, horrible company.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com