The problem with liability here is that software as a discipline is so subjective anything can be argued from any expert just out of a boot camp.
Which is why it is a lawyers dream unless it is completely reworked.
Which is why it is a lawyers dream unless it is completely reworked.
I'm really not sure this is case. I'm sure there are plenty of people who would have argued medical practice is more of an art, than a science, before the introduction of strong med mal regimes. Everyone tends to think their field is special!
If we go down this path then we need proper licensing, certifications, and changes should be as well tested as the fda process. Aka releasing software is as rigorous as releasing a new drug.