Put differently, Buffett could personally fund 10k open source contributors 200k per year for their lifetime (60 years) if he wanted to.
So maybe that's the solution? Convince billionaires that open source software is a philanthropic endeavor?
Put differently, Buffett could personally fund 10k open source contributors 200k per year for their lifetime (60 years) if he wanted to.
So maybe that's the solution? Convince billionaires that open source software is a philanthropic endeavor?
I'm curious how he earns so much? That seems like a lot for someone who is associated with FOSS, even if they are so influential/skilled.
Source?
Is it, though? This isn't the attitude we have towards things like USB-IF or the Unicode Consortium, both of which are non-profits that were started by for-profit companies trying to solve a technical challenge for their own, joint benefit.
Hardware and software companies need a working operating system to be able to make money.
Linux could get dramatically more resources if they could just drop their big-ego'd "CLI is god" mentality. Yes, Linux is a powerhouse OS, but it only appeals to a tiny slice of the population.