Which line of reasoning allows natural intelligence do the the same thing artificial intelligence isn't allowed to do.
- The qualitative differences. You can't run an unbounded # of simultaneous and 24/7 instances of a natural human intelligence.
- Machine learning models are not people and do not have rights.
- Obtaining the training material itself requires massive copyright infringement. GPT-3 was even openly trained on books from a literal pirate torrent tracker.
What's stopping a human from reading all of the same books?
Even the most dedicated readers will only read a few thousand books in their lifetime. https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/93594/heres-how-many-boo...
ChatGPT is trained on orders of magnitude more books than a human can consume.
https://torrentfreak.com/authors-accuse-openai-of-using-pira...
> OpenAI hasn’t disclosed the datasets that ChatGPT is trained on, but in an older paper two databases are referenced; “Books1” and “Books2”. The first one contains roughly 63,000 titles and the latter around 294,000 titles