So, to me, it looks like someone decided to subsidize electric car manufacturers, and just needed an excuse in some legal framework. There might be a scandal there (e.g. bribes), but 6.67 factor ain't it.
So, to me, it looks like someone decided to subsidize electric car manufacturers, and just needed an excuse in some legal framework. There might be a scandal there (e.g. bribes), but 6.67 factor ain't it.
For instance, maybe Ford has to sell the equivalent of one Mach-e for every ten gas-powered F-150s, but if the efficiency numbers were accounted for more accurately they'd have to sell six Mach-e's for every ten F-150s.
Or, alternatively, it's a way to get credit from the government for making efficient vehicles, when the vehicle in question is an F-150 Lightning. Perhaps it's a fine truck for what it's worth, but it's the exact opposite of an efficient vehicle unless you're using it for a use case where only a large truck will do.
EVs had all sorts of excuses and magic multipliers. While in reality small ICE vehicles are very efficient and may produce less CO2 per mile!