The New Story of the Milky Way's Surprisingly Turbulent Past
scientificamerican.com
scientificamerican.com
http://www.tng-project.org/movies/tng/tng50_single_galaxy_fo...
From the IllustrisTNG[1] cosmological simulation project:
> Formation of a single galaxy "g3", tracked through time from high redshift until the present day. This relatively "average" TNG50 galaxy will be just slightly less massive than our own Milky Way at z=0. We include a large-scale view (lower left), and zoomed in views of the central gas and stellar structures (lower right), while the main panel shows projected gas density. At z=1.5 we pause and rotate around the system, showing in order: gas metallicity, gas velocity field, and H-alpha luminosity, before continuing. What is a small dwarf at high redshift (108.3 solar masses in stars at z=4) transitions, at late times, into a large stable disk with a quasi-steady star formation rate of a few solar masses per year.
I thought that "standard candles" were required to estimate the distance to any region of space?
How can the distance to arbitrary stars be determined without these markers?
There is a limit to this method of measurement, based on the accuracy of the telescope. For Gaia:
> The European Space Agency's Gaia mission is expected to measure parallax angles to an accuracy of 10 microarcseconds for all moderately bright stars, thus mapping nearby stars (and potentially planets) up to a distance of tens of thousands of light-years from Earth.
The Milky Way is about 100,000 light-years wide. So it is able to accurately measure the distance for a _lot_ of stars around us in our galaxy.
This video probably explains it better: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jdy09y0A4t0
Maybe science fiction authors can stop making up locations entirely now.