Talk about a conflict of interest. A company that pushes llms for legal work says they work better.
This isn't worth the pdf it wasn't printed on.
This isn't worth the pdf it wasn't printed on.
They sometimes are.
If you have an issue with the methodology of paper then all well and good but "conflict of interest" is pretty weak.
Yes, Google and Microsoft et al regularly publish papers describing Sota performance they sometimes use internally and even sell. I didn't have to think much before wavenet came to mind.
Besides, the best performing models here are all Open AI.
Not that this isn't exactly what all the big "tech innovation" of the last decade were either. It's depressing and everyone involved should be ashamed of themselves.