This is demonstrably false. Nukes have allowed those who have them, to bully (wage asymmetric warfare on) those who don't.
Would the USA have been so cock-sure about murdering 5% of Iraqs population, if it didn't have nukes?
This is demonstrably false. Nukes have allowed those who have them, to bully (wage asymmetric warfare on) those who don't.
Would the USA have been so cock-sure about murdering 5% of Iraqs population, if it didn't have nukes?
The US was very clear in not attacking Iranians, though Iranian support was the vehicle by which US troops were attacked. Iran got a measured response for its allies because Iran 'carries a big stick'
Air or missile strikes against US territory are very difficult to pull off. Only China or Russia would have any chance to overwhelm US missile defenses. Anything small-scale would be answered by conventional strikes and a ground invasion. No nukes are warranted unless entire cities get slagged or nukes or biological or chemical weapons are used.