Hacker News Reader

I agree. Why should I care that this exists? Does it correct a flaw in zig / rust / C / Nim / Dmd? Does it explore the space of programming languages? (And if so, what’s actually new about it?). Or is it a way for the author to noodle around with their own programming language?

I have no objection to any of those goals. But it would be nice if the author were clear about what they’re doing with the project.

A princess doesn't have to explain herself.

Can't argue with that logic alright.

The top left corner gives the hint "A modern C-like Programming language with focus on structural typing." Not sure what "coding like royalty" is meant to mean honestly. To me royalty conjures useless rent-seeking incompetent cruft that sits on their ass and extracts value from their subjects.

> Not sure what "coding like royalty" is meant to mean honestly

C, but the headers have all been removed.

When I read "coding like royalty", the first thing I thought of was "let others do the coding for you". But in that case, you wouldn't care about the programming language...

If this language is "coding like royalty", does that make no-code systems "coding for the cream of society"? (because they're aimed at the rich and thick)