Maybe that was implied by the capitalization of "News", but regardless, it's the same argument.
Reporters are not scientsts. The whole thing is like a hilarious public announcement that the editor in chief of Science has Gell-Mann Amnesia.
Reporters are not scientsts. The whole thing is like a hilarious public announcement that the editor in chief of Science has Gell-Mann Amnesia.
Science reporters are probably, hopefully, scientifically literate.