So to be certain you'll avoid discrimination, you'd need to omit both the photo and the name from the CV, and that's not common at all.
It often works, which is why they do it.
> Please ensure you remove references to your: ... educational institutions
https://www.civil-service-careers.gov.uk/ipo-recruitment-sup...
If the employer won't digitally sign their denial of my resume,or even acknowledge the reason for my denial, I'm not digitally signing mine; which means it's a theatre of discrimination disguised as "filtering" from BOTH sides.
I'm surprised so many prolific firms beyond FAANG still treat hiring like the big accounting firms of yore did/do.
This means children from immigrant families growing up in Europe would be discriminated against simply because of how they look and what their last name is.
That’s classic discrimination.
My points are that hiring should be more based on applied challenges and gauging recruit success in context. The heavy cost of vetting should be part of the onboarding, not recruiting; which would put the onus on the employer and away from the often discriminated employee.