Hacker News Reader

I am very uncomfortable with this being released commercially without the requisite defence against misuse being also accessible. If we didn't have a problem with deepfakes, spam, misleading media before, we surely are now. All leading AI organisations are lacking here, benefiting from the tech but not sufficiently attacking the external costs that society will pay.

View on HN

What's "the requisite defence"?

Something like a watermark (doesn't necessarily have to be visible to people) and a tool to detect that watermark might be nice for example. Or alternatively we could stop developing this hell technology and try to automate something that isn't cultural expression.

Both of those are included and mentioned in the linked article.

Two things I would like - advances in detectors or generative content that do not do c2pa, and more transparency in what the usage policy means in practice.

Two things I would like - algorithmic disgorgement and an apology to the human race.

I'm very uncomfortable with this technology being accessible only to a small and arbitrary subset of the population.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com