No focus, no fights, and a bad back – 16 ways technology has ruined my life
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
This happened to me twice just last week: first at a museum when I asked for a map and was told they simply didn't have them anymore and I'd have to use my phone, then at a restaurant where it was the same story. Browsing a menu on a phone is a really poor experience, it's just not enough space to see much at once and that's even without accounting for whatever awful navigation they built. This isn't a big problem, but it is worse than how things used to be and nobody likes when technology makes things worse.
It reminds me of how rail stations have moved to digital signs. In the past there were kiosks displaying a paper map of the rail lines, and there were other kiosks displaying ads and other things. Well now there are new digital signs that cycle between the rail map and a bunch of ads. It's a worse experience, it makes pulling up the app seem pleasant by comparison.
Of all the people in the restaurant that contribute to my experience eating out, the waiter probably offers the least differentiation (in my humble opinion). It's just a transport layer for the order. The food is made by line staff, the menu is designed by someone else. The overall music, lighting, ambience, decor is someone else. But culturally, the waiter is the one we are expected to tip.
The pricing of the meal is what pays for the music, lighting, ambience and decor.
I'm not saying any of this makes sense, or that I think it's a good system, but I know too many people who rationalize poor tipping because they disagree with a system that the wait staff has no power to control.
I want the system to change, but I also don't feel that it's right to protest against it at the expense of the people least able to do anything about it.
Should the place have a few menus printed out on paper, probably. But the number of people that demand paper is rather low.
Now, with online menus, they can basically slowly keep increasing prices any time without any cost to them. No wonder they love it!
The worst thing is most of them don't even have actual responsive websites. It's just a literal PDF download that you now have to keep panning left right on a tiny screen.
I could almost get into it if it were a large screen tablet mounted at the table, with a great UI, where you just tap, tap, tap out your order, hit submit, and poof your drinks and food arrive. Pop in your credit card to pay, and off you go! At least make good use of the digital user interface. Reduce inefficiencies like the wait staff having to make dozens of trips to collect your drink order, come back, take your meal order, come back, take your credit card, return your credit card.
But, no, they digitized the only part of the restaurant that already was working pretty efficiently in physical form.
>The QR-Code Menu Is Being Shown the Door
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/22/dining/restaurant-qr-code...
> I can remember a time when it was considered ungentlemanly to check the factual accuracy of a statement made by a drinking companion. You were just meant to counter their argument by presenting specious facts of your own.
Really? Your objection to technology is that people suddenly have to contend with accurate information!?
Which hey, I get. Been there, done that.
Personally, the reason I did it (and ended up stopping) was due to persistent narcissistic abuse, and attempting to stop/control it without being able to leave - and later (after a lot of therapy) realizing i could just have listened to my gut 90% of the time, and just left/or not listened.
Turns out, PTSD and social conditioning is a bitch though.
I replied with the below, and I expect to hear nothing back.
> I'm super curious about that claim: apart from undoing things like detaining families and children, what would you say the current administration has done to "undo" something the previous administration did? I'm especially curious if you think these were "undoing" acts of the previous admin:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Rescue_Plan_Act_of_20... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Investment_and_... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bipartisan_Safer_Communities_A... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHIPS_and_Science_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_Reduction_Act
Nowadays, outside of a Jeopardy! stage, when does anyone even need a memory?
30 years ago this was limited to pubs though.
And, even today, the most renowned restaurant guide is a tyre manufacturer.
Now, the Internet is a vast sea of half-baked facts with millions of echo chambers that discourage verification.
I like talking to my friends, I like intimate conversations. When a question comes up I don't really want the answer. Sure truth and facts are nice, but what I want is to hear what someone else thinks about the topic. Taking out a phone and searching for the answer doesn't just resolve the dispute, it breaks the person's train of thought and stops their mind from wandering to new places.
This author mostly writes semi-humorous self-deprecating stuff for the "Life & Style" section of the paper, so don't take it too seriously: https://www.theguardian.com/profile/timdowling
Not that we can't have a serious conversation about the topics of course.
It's easy to point fingers -- dumb author, evil greedy company -- but the truth is generally more mundane and more perplexing: bad outcomes often arise from everyone involved trying to do reasonable things.
Seriously, in 2024 there is no excuse... but folks without any discipline/resolve like to take weak shortcuts in their lives and then complain when unavoidable results eventually come in.
2. Fix posture with one of many back support options and a good chair. Write 'posture' on a sticky and slap it on wall. Get light exercise frequently.
3. uBlockOrigin and NoScript on Firefox allow you to selectively block all kinds of login pages and cookie permissions and so on. Often wrecks page functionality, but then you can click on different scripts in NoScript to see which ones are needed.
4. You want something that causes your Zoom meeting to freeze up while claiming a bad WiFi connection is the issue. Here we are: https://github.com/abagh0703/turn-off-wifi
5. When going to pub, turn off phone. If the FOMO is unbearable, don't go to pub, and maybe get therapeutic help.
6. Avoid IoT smart products, they're mostly a scam with bad security protocols and terrible interfaces.
7. & 8. Mute, block, ignore. Don't follow the shiny red ball.
9. Switch to using an editor like vim with autocomplete turned off to improve your typing.
And so on. I suspect the author was subjected to the Apple-Microsoft brainwashing propaganda program at some point, in which technical tinkering was discouraged and acceptance of the closed corporate ecosystem was encouraged, and this is the result.
It's as if someone asked 'what's eating?' and they were told, 'well, you go to McDonald's and press the button for the thing that looks good, and then you eat it.' Learning how to cook your own meals - i.e. not taking what's on offer from the corporate conglomerate - is a much better and more satisfying option.
The attention span issue and the constant deluge of psychological torment in the form of doom and gloom are two that I recognize every day and have had to make deliberate and sometimes limiting choices in my life to intentionally avoid.
I got my attention back, and you can too.
Edit: Just checked, can't add WhatsApp, etc to it. sigh another potential option gone
This is a big problem. Previously, 'the mob' only came into being when things got really bad. Now it is a constant (virtual) presence.
Heck, that ship sailed with the invention of the printing press (tabloids).
In those mediums (even tabloid press), there is a lot of centralization and control, combined with limited reach for any random nutter, combined with profit incentives that push towards relatively median behavior.
For instance, running a publicly accessible Radio and TV station requires compliance with extensive regulations, and to have significant reach requires significant (fixed) equipment and capital. Which makes that person easy to find, and with something significant to lose.
Cable reduces regulation, but the ‘easy to find, and something to lose’ problem is still there to some extent. PPV type rules limited that somewhat, since because the content wasn’t public it reduced a lot of liability (“if you don’t like it, don’t buy it!”) and coupled the liability they did get with actual money to offset it.
So, if someone wants to be doing it for long, they need to be able to make enough money off it (be providing something of value) to pay back equipment, and not be pissing people off enough they are incentivized to hunt them down. While giving out the content to the public for free.
Tabloids did change that dynamic a little, but have a similar issue of how to get paid/money without getting too much blowback. And the reach is limited to a small area, so unless they get distributors or the like, it’s a similar type of issue.
The internet changed this dynamic a lot - someone can run a website/service in any jurisdiction (and banning it is hard), and it can connect people globally (so potentially near infinite audience!) with very little extra work. It cuts out all the middlemen. It’s also relatively inexpensive in capital and work hours for a ‘info bit’ to be distributed compared to any other medium.
The hardest part is figuring out how to get paid, and if you can do that you’re doing pretty good.
Interestingly, social media is essentially a sweet spot here.
They get to disclaim liability for the actual message, while being able to algorithmically pick the messages with the most engagement (typically the most incendiary!), with relatively low equipment costs, and then get paid by ‘volume’/turnover (aka ads).
It’s like being a stock broker or market during the 20’s stock market boom, collecting commissions and pushing the craziest options to the most gullible.
Fascinating, really.
And in a similar vein, the abuses there did end up creating a huge economic collapse and the SEC.
In this case, I suspect it will end up creating a huge trust/attention collapse which will cause significant economic re-ordering (and contraction) as people stop doing transactions because they are getting scammed/stolen from.
Possible economic contraction too as a lot of things revert back to older ‘known good’ behaviors due to reduced risk appetites.
Enter your IQ to allow access to Wikipedia ...
Societal changes such as free education might improve the situation, not more segregation.
> Or you may have faced a similar reckoning in an unfamiliar shower, or standing before a seemingly ordinary hob. The relentless development of new ways to turn things on has led us steadily away from the intuitive and toward the wilfully [sic] enigmatic.
The rest of the article seems to be complaining about post-iPhone technology, but showers have been weird since at least the 80s (probably earlier, but speaking only from personal experience here).
Huh, before computers I can remember 77 open notebooks scattered across my bedroom. Nothing changes.
I know this is dependent on situation, but “I am traveling” is a reasonable enough excuse. If you’re in a remote office with other workers who are on same meeting, yeah, you probably shouldn’t miss that meeting. Otherwise, “I’m traveling” is reasonable enough.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/where-the-word-dooz...
I've been studying foreign languages over the past few years. Even though people hundreds of years ago have learned languages without computers, I would have never been able to succeed without technology—in fact, I struggled a lot studying a required language with paper books in high school. Online discussions helped me find the best books and good-enough techniques to start, and streaming services let me easily find foreign television series (along with dubbed series) which made listening comprehension so much easier and fun.
I was also able to learn the fundamentals of software development much easier with the help of technological aids (specifically by creating my own flashcards, which helped me drill practice problems), which has helped me with work. My physical health has also improved thanks to great advice on diet and exercise available online.
Most importantly, technology has been a way for me to work closely with people living far away from me. I really have felt that I can rely on others (as I hope they can rely on me) from conversations and communication online, even if we've never met face-to-face in-person.
My personal belief is that the amount of time spent on screens isn't usually a problem for living a healthy life. What's important is instead how you spend your time using screens: anything deliberately engineered to take your attention and time is generally a leech on life, whereas anything that helps you develop a skill or meaningfully connect with other people enriches it.
Even if I spend time in front of my screen, I try to avoid slipping into nonsense.