Passpoint WiFi tech promises cellphone-like handoff between hotspots
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
Nice to see things happening but the main problem to solve is not the end user equipment this article talks about, but rather operator systems (systems that could handle this and scale for the increased traffic is not something many operators have).
Overall, Passpoint can help decrease cellular traffic and redirect it over fixed lines via Wi-Fi. So IMHO it might be attractive to operators.
Pros: - It bypasses your monthly fair-use quota - Offers a higher bandwidth.
Cons: - You need to leave your WiFi on, which drains battery. - Support on Android is very poor.
An ESS network is most often under a single organization (say, the IT department of a large Hotel). The Wi-Fi credential combination required by a user to roam across the different Access Points in the ESS is the same.
But what about when you leave hotel premises and go to the airport? Manual intervention is often required by you, especially if you are going to that airport for the first time and have not yet purchased a plan there. With Passpoint, the hotels in the city, the airport etc could all be participating in a common program. Sign up once, use anywhere. With passpoint software, your device has a _standardized_ way to avail of such facilities.
The ESS architecture does not handle such possibilities - it operates at a much lower level. Higher level handshaking is required to enable this, and in a standards defined manner so that it works everywhere.