This is such a hilariously bad take that I can't believe a serious paper has published it.
Maybe underestimated: looks more like 50 years than 500, is closer.
Apart title, the ideas behind are right, many feels something is going bad, but luddism is a wrong choice, tech actually is necessary to do things better..
I don’t know about others but I find the cynicism of The Guardian to be quite boring.
We don’t even know how to build AGI yet people are pencilling in dates into calendars with confidence as to when it kills us?
There is risk certainly but that just comes across as delusional