http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=1157...
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=1157...
Also you have to re-download the image every 3 months, and get it set up again. I can't just toss a virtualbox image on my personal Ubuntu machine and test in IE6-8. I need a Windows computer to test my personal sites (which are barely worth development time.)
"may or may not work in other hosting environments."
&
"simply shutdown the VPC image and discard the changes you’ve made from undo disks to reset the image back to its initial state. By doing either of these methods, you can technically have a base image which never expires although you will never be able to permanently save any changes on these images for longer than 90 days."
... so it seems pretty positive, really.
Which, as someone who'd like to see more Free operating systems and less proprietary ones, is a bit of a shame! :P
I.e. they cost nothing but your time...
- the website was a nightmare to use (maybe it has improved)
- it was impossible to work out what you could and couldn't do - I suggest just use it and ignore details.
- you incur a time debt three years later sorting out OS/Office installs.
If you are funded, MSDN and proper licenses might make more sense.
I've been reading a lot of these kinds of articles from the IE team lately ("Our browser is better now, why does everyone still hate us?"). And I have to admit, IE9 is a huge leap forward in terms of standards compliance and general non-wonkiness.
But until they really focus on making the development and testing processes better, I'm still going to groan about having to support it.
If you want to support IE, owning a copy of Windows is not optional.