It's unclear what you mean by memorization. However I can request images for which it's obvious that no clear precursor exists, so something original must be being created.
Here's a Volkswagen Beetle made from brains:
Here's a Volkswagen Beetle made from brains:
It's these basic mistakes that is so incongruous between human and machine intelligence. No matter how big the model, it always makes these same type of basic confabulations, just less often.
But just to nail this point home, here's what I get when I explicitly ask that the bubble cover the entire head:
I’m as impressed as you are at the quality. Where I’m dubious is whether this confabulation problem can ever be made to completely go away.
Perhaps we need much larger models that can better understand the world.
I’ve always thought it weird that we use much smaller models for image generation than text generation!
It's a ridiculous situation - a horse in outer space in a space suit. But you want the image to be hyper physically accurate. That's fine, but it's a little incongruous. I wouldn't expect a human artist to be able to guess your requirements, let alone an AI.
So no, I do not believe any amount of computer resources will let the AI guess your requirements. You'll have to spell them out, as I did with the bubble for you once already. If you want the tail to be enclosed as well, you'll have to spell it out.
The whole point of this discussion is to determine whether the AI is simply copy/pasting images it's seen before. We've determined that it does not - it is able to synthesis new images by understanding what it's seen.
Whether it can read your mind is a silly digression.
Because, as I have repeatedly tried to explain to you, the idea of a horse in space is ridiculous and tends toward ridiculous renditions.
I'm going to stop replying to you now. Have a nice day.