Broadcom CEO pay award jumps 164% to $160.8M
theregister.com
theregister.com
Take this:
"Intel reported that its new CEO Pat Gelsinger earned $178.59 million in total compensation over an 11-month span from when he started in February 2021, until the end of the year."
No he didn't. He didn't hit any of the stock goals since signing on as CEO, and the grants will likely expire before Intel's price hits those goals (I think the lowest target is in the 80 dollars).
His actual compensation? About $10M - quite a bit of it being a sign on bonus.
https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/intel-ceo-pa...
To retain and motivate Hock Tan, President and CEO, and
Charlie Kawwas, President, Semiconductor Solutions Group,
the independent members of the Board granted Mr. Tan and
the Compensation Committee granted Dr. Kawwas performance
stock unit (PSU) awards in fiscal 2023 that require (i)
achievement of formidable stock price performance hurdles
and (ii) continued service over a five-year vesting
period.
Mr. Tan’s fiscal 2023 PSU award was front-loaded to cover
the market-based value of both his annual cash and long-
term incentive opportunities over a period of five years.
Dr. Kawwas’ fiscal 2023 PSU award was also front-loaded
to cover the market-based value of his annual long-term
incentive opportunities over a period of five years. The
annualized GAAP value of these PSU awards was in line
with our compensation peer group benchmarks. During the
five-year vesting period, we do not intend to grant
annual equity awards to Mr. Tan and Dr. Kawwas and Mr.
Tan will not be eligible to receive annual cash incentive
payouts because these PSU awards were front-loaded.
These PSU awards are 100% at risk and deliver value to Mr.
Tan and Dr. Kawwas only if our stockholders receive
significant and sustained value appreciation. Additional
disclosure on the methodology and design of these PSU
awards is provided below in “Compensation Discussion and
Analysis.”Meanwhile, other people receive billions, their board gets sued for breach of fiduciary duty and people still think the CEO is deserving on HN.
The writers or publishers are knowingly putting out clickbait / ragebait, and people eat it up, even on a forum such as this one filled with somewhat educated individuals.
That's a pretty sweeping generalization. As Ronald Reagan used to say (to the point of annoying Mikhail Gorbachev), the old Russian proverb is, trust, but verify.
Or as they say in the nuclear Navy (and I hammer into my 3L students), you get what you INspect, not what you EXpect.
Can confirm a current Broadcom VMware customer went from $8M renewal to $100M
I hear about it constantly reading HN and Reddit.
In short: no. Broadcom knows their top 600 or so accounts that are nearly 50% of their revenue have no place to run, and the remaining 6000 or so will be forced to bite the bullet.
Everyone else (eg, "distribution channels") are a 10% revenue blip in the radar that Broadcom doesn't care about having wind down or disappear.
https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/30/broadcom_strategy_vmw...
From what I've heard it seems that most enterprises are moving to Hyper-V because it's already included in their Microsoft agreements (server Datacenter licenses).
I'm sure Hock Tan would see it differently, but I interpret that as a vote of no-confidence in VMware followed by extracting as much cash as possible before the ship sinks. Were I in the market for VMware today, no, I would not be.
And starting with vSphere 7 it's been really easy to manage and snappy with a full web interface (it used to be a weird half thick client/half web interface management).
People don't realize how revolutionary VMware was in the IT community, it was probably the biggest disruption between 2005-2015.