Three times I’ve been involved in a Kubernetes (or competitor) migration where the plot gets lost along the way. At my current company we have canceled the product roadmap to focus on year three of the migration and we likely have at least another year to go.
No one can tell me why our current ECS based deployments are a problem. No one bothered to train people on appropriate uses of Kafka before double abstracting it into a framework.
But hey, the board was promised a cost savings and globally available product from this effort so at least the executive that promised it all has two more years to figure out how to make good on it.
Best of all is we have a new CTO and he has openly questioned why we don’t just use Kubernetes itself instead of the couple of Hashicorp products we’ve settled on. Maybe I’ll get to do this a fourth time once we finish the current migration.
This is the most surreal thing I've read on here. You went from a company that delivers some product, to a company that delivers a migration.
You sure your company is not the one in the OP? ;)
The problem is it's not Kubernetes.
I am in the exact same situation. New manager arrives and wants to move to Kubernetes, just because.
Because suggesting Hashicorp over Kubernetes makes a lot of sense so long as you are ignorant about budgets and costs. Because from experience they are one of the worst vendors around at squeezing money out of their customers.
I imagine if you were the CTO you would likely agree with them.
We’re just cosplaying a large tech org when this company, like the others I’ve been at, is a sales company with an IT team. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that. It’s a good business to be in. We just don’t need a complex runtime with software defined networking to deploy a series of three server blue/green deployments for relatively low traffic use cases.
The problem itself has been the same for the past three companies I’ve worked at.
In reality, though, a migration to K8S in most organizations won't take only 11 weeks because most organizations are completely dysfunctional.
Of course these companies exist and there is a core of truth in what the article says. Otherwise, it wouldn't be satire.