The focus clearly needs to be put on adding substantial supply, and in Canada at least, reigning in the demand from new immigration.
The focus clearly needs to be put on adding substantial supply, and in Canada at least, reigning in the demand from new immigration.
And yes, I agree the house problem is a supply-vs-demand issue. And this is not addressing the core problem. But in a place with extremely low rent vacancy [2], having units removed from the market for STR isn't helping.
[1]: https://vancouver.ca/home-property-development/empty-homes-t... [2]: https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/rent-prices-rose-in-2023-1....
The idea that full-time airbnbs could ever complete with the brutal efficiency of the hotel industry is crazy, but again, the only reason why AirBnB exists is to capture the some of the real estate value created by the artificial real estate shortage.
This won’t solve the problem because AirBnB is a fundamentally different lodging stock that meets different market demands. A traditional hotel cannot reasonably accommodate a group of friends / a few families that want to stay together, cook together, eat, and recreate in the same living space.
The most a hotel can usually offer is a sad suite with an efficiency kitchen. More often it’s connected rooms with Grandma and Grandpa three floors away and another Aunt and Uncle in the other tower of the hotel.
What is more common in a healthy housing market with lots of vacancy is that prices continue to go up, but below inflation.
When someone is looking to move to an area, they're looking to move to the area, not a specific municipality. If the municipality that banned AirBnB were isolated enough from other communities that did allow AirBnB you would likely see rents decrease as supply would meaningfully increase when the AirBnBs are banned. But in practice, the number of AirBnBs in the municipality that bans them relative to the number of houses in the same rental market area is small.