Well, what is supposed to be good in this situation and to whom?
Considering all the talk about AI risks, talk which has been put out by Altman and the others involved in this as much as anyone, I would say "good" would mean people who can be trusted to be responsible stewards of such a potentially risky technology. At the very least, that would mean people who (a) can act like mature adults, and (b) have a healthy amount of humility. I don't see either of those characteristics in any of the people involved in all this.
There exist literally zero organizations on the planet that I would fully trust to build anything approaching AGI on behalf of humanity
Same, but some animals are more equal than others. I'd personally trust one of those Japanese companies that lasted hundreds of years more on questions like stability and carefulness, compared to a flash-in-the-pan SV startup that's been around since 2016.
> what is supposed to be good
why do you presume that there must be a good party here?