If someone is overly enthusiastic and doesn’t have the skills it’s not always the case but often they are running a game on you.
If someone is overly enthusiastic and doesn’t have the skills it’s not always the case but often they are running a game on you.
Some people are super competent and have a great attitude while others can be below average and make everyone around them miserable. I’ve seen every combination.
I’m just saying that an unnecessarily negative attitude is more damaging to a group than one below average contributor.
I realize you didn't say that exactly, but this is what the tone of OPs article is. IF you are a lowly IC, no matter how skilled, you must be the good subservient. The King demands a cheery disposition.
But the King is allowed to behave in any way he chooses. Capriciously firing people. Yelling, demanding, berating, snap judgements, etc...
I don't think anyone said that.
Bad attitudes are damaging regardless of which team member acts that way. Manager, Project Manager, Jr. Engineer, etc. An anxious/spazzy Project Manager can unnecessarily put everyone on edge.
Shitty people make other people miserable, period.
They sound like a bad/lazy manager. If their report is overqualified, they need to be fed better, harder, larger work. If their report has a bad attitude, a decent manager would figure out what's misaligned and fix it.