Is there any evidence to support the case that sending more weapons to Ukraine will spare lives?
If so. Shouldn't we prioritize sending weapons to the people of Gaza first, since their casualty numbers are much higher?
If so. Shouldn't we prioritize sending weapons to the people of Gaza first, since their casualty numbers are much higher?
If sending more weapons results in lives saved, then this would be an excellent argument for arming Gaza with modern weapons. In terms of children saved the effect could be sizeable.
Sending long range weapons together with F-16 can help to destroy missiles and other long range weapons Russian terrorists use daily on Ukrainian cities.
By sending enough 155cm shells Russian advance could be stopped, which mean less cities will be grounded. Because that is the only way Russian occupational army could advance: by total destruction of everything.