I’m sorry, but if you think that an in-person robot with an animated face is more charismatic than a human being, we must live in different universes.
Fake emotions aren't very charismatic, you feel the fakeness from a mile away, a robot showing emotions without that hint of fakeness is way better. Of course you would need to build a model around that, which people hasn't done, but the rules for charismatic social interactions such as serving food are really simple so I see no reason why that would be hard to do.
Maybe you are underestimating robots here, based on the sci fi robots that are very inflexible and bad at showing emotions? We know that AI can show extremely expressive faces when they draw images etc, there is no reason to believe they wouldn't be able to do that since they already can do it.
By charisma I mean in the sense of higher-level sociopolitical organization, like being a manager at a company or giving a public speech – useful skills in the job market that will continue to be useful. Not serving french fries. A smiling robot isn't going to inspire or convince a human being of anything.
Regardless, the idea that a robot smiling is somehow "more charismatic" than a human being is absurd. People read too much sci-fi.
That wasn't the point, the point is whether you can feel that they are fake or not, doesn't matter if they actually are. Fake feeling emotions are much harder to convey for a robot since they require more nuance.
> A smiling robot isn't going to inspire or convince a human being of anything.
They already have, smiling robots with basically no intelligence are already making billions for corporations in phone games.
> Regardless, the idea that a robot smiling is somehow "more charismatic" than a human being is absurd. People read too much sci-fi.
Why is that absurd? The idea that robots can't be charismatic is probably the most common trope of sci-fi, in reality we see robots mastering soft skills way easier than hard skills, there is no reason to believe charisma will come after understanding at this point, if you believe that you have your head in the sand.
Speculating about superhuman AI androids that are more charismatic than humans is entirely beyond the point and nothing more than a sci-fi fantasy right now.
Unfortunately, AI discussions as of late seem to be filled with this kind of absurd speculation that is no more than magical thinking. It belongs on a science fiction forum.
Right, and managers are extremely unsafe with the tools we already have. LLMs are more charismatic writers than most managers, and we know from Uber that we can automate away the management layer easily as long as we can have other signals to govern workers. With remote jobs being popular today face to face communication isn't needed, you just need to write well, so that isn't a problem either.
Managers doesn't need as much subject matter expertise as workers, so managers will get automated away easier than workers.
> Speculating about superhuman AI androids that are more charismatic than humans is entirely beyond the point and nothing more than a sci-fi fantasy right now.
I didn't say android, I say an avatar, I meant on a screen. And no you don't need a superhuman AI to express emotions better than humans, we already have AI that are better than humans at expressing emotions, both in text as LLMs or in images from the image generators.
Ultimately though, that's just muscle under skin — with sufficient effort it's obviously replicable, and thus a question of when.