Hacker News Reader

HNHacker News

Top New Best Ask Show Jobs

Comment by pkage | Hacker News Reader

Full thread

pkage·

For an identical price point you can get a brand-new ASUS vivobook[0] which features:

- a 15" 1080p (!) screen

- 6 hour battery life (vs 18h)

- plastic frame (vs aluminum)

- inferior cpu performance (Intel Core i7 1255U vs M1)

Though it does have some pros:

- 16gb of ram (vs 8gb)

- 1tb of disk (vs 256gb)

Seems like the M1 MBP is a great option and I'm glad it's more accessible.

[0]: https://www.walmart.com/ip/ASUS-VivoBook-15-15-6-Touchscreen...

View on HN

My view is that unless you're looking to do something really performance-sensitive (e.g., gaming), specs don't matter nearly as much as user experience: nice screen, nice keyboard and touchpad, decent battery life, good build quality. Entry-level CPUs and SSDs are so good these days that you're really not getting much by spending more on bigger numbers, unless you really care about performance-sensitive use cases.

That has a touchscreen, and isn't a bad deal for $700, depending on your use case.

It's so hard to know if it's a good quality device or if it'll feel like a cheap plastic toy, but if it has survived being on the show floor at Walmart it's probably pretty durable.

> touchscreen

No point on a laptop. Some point if the laptop has a tablet design (removable keyboard or fold-underneath keyboard).

I have a touchscreen on my laptop. Pretty useless to be honest when I used a Windows 10 VM (pointer pass-through) and really useless in Ubuntu.

Presumably Windows 11 has better support?

Sorry, the only use case I can come up with is if you strictly need a Windows laptop because some software only runs on Windows (e.g. a game or Matlab or something). But for practically everyone else this is a terrible purchase.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com