I actually believe that mainstream media is more balanced nowadays compared to a few years ago. I think that they've caught on to the fact that trust has eroded in recent years and are adjusting. However critics have not yet realized that.
Funny to get flagged by people who don't have anything to say in response by the way. Whenever politics are involved I take it as validation.
It's not that the critics haven't caught on, its that the same people/orgs/editors who weren't trustworthy last year aren't trustworthy this year just because they're trying to appear more trustworthy - it should make you more suspicious that these shrieking propagandists are trying to earn your trust, not less suspicious.
If I have to make a recommendation, the Wall Street Journal has been consistently high-quality in my experience.
I don't trust the wall street journal or the new york times. They are mouthpieces.
"The Fitzwilliam Museum has suggested that paintings of the British countryside evoke dark “nationalist feelings”."
Winston Smith got nothin' on these guys. Via https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/03/the-dark-side...