How is it readable when you're limiting text width and not taking advantage of the whole screen you paid for?
[Turning 48 next month and wearing glasses.]
How is it readable when you're limiting text width and not taking advantage of the whole screen you paid for?
[Turning 48 next month and wearing glasses.]
I have a feeling it was the standard because they used the minimum font size to make the letters readable, and that's how much it fit on the physical page width. Which was standardized before typewriters for unknown historical reasons?
> You don't want to move your neck when you read a single line that's kinda silly.
I don't have to move my neck to read the article spread across the full width of my monitor. On 13" laptop or 24" desktops. Are you using a 21:9 utrawide?
Also WCAG recommends line length set to <80 characters too [2]. I'm not sure what else could make this more convincing or official.
1 - https://baymard.com/blog/line-length-readability
2 - https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/visual-presentat...
"recommends". Want to deny me the option of longer lines?