And who among us has a CEO that isn’t problematic, even if not so much so as Musk?
Not to mar these specific engineers, but that's an empty phrase that can be said about anything ever built. It doesn't somehow make the idea or implementation good.
>Oh no, I only want _pure_ intentions for anything I use. Which is why I reject all for profit medicine.
It doesn't matter why he did it. What matters is that he did it.
- He pointed out that his understanding was that it would be open source in some way
- The name OpenAI implies an open source endeavor. I dont know many things named Open that are in fact close sourced.
You can criticize Elon Musk without criticizing people who would have their lives upended if they quit or were fired.
(Removed "complicit" because I don't like the way that sounded)