Antitrust suit could force Apple to reveal its secrets
axios.com
axios.com
This is not blogging or microblogging even. Dot-Pointalism? Very scattered and uninspiring format.
Seems like the same format for the whole website. Preparing for transition to completely AI written articles?
Granted even in this outline there's some opinions expressed, like calling Apple 'famously tight lipped.' That's about as true as an opinion could be, but it's still an opinion. A way to just get the falsifiable facts in news, without interjecting opinion, spin, or "analysis" is my ideal vision of news. For instance here's [1] a NYTimes article from 1912, about the sinking of the Titanic. Outside of superfluous comments about the Titanic's wireless operator, it's just the perfect news article.
[1] - https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/learning/general...
We'd use a similar format and verbiage in the policy and business space as well. No fluff words, no pathos, just plain and simple facts, impact, and path forward.
A NYT article can take 5-10 minutes to read and provide marginal information to act upon but this style (which Reuters also uses to a certain extent because they have experimented with Machine Generated articles for decades) takes barely a minute and gives all the information that is needed
The article is hyper focused, and manages to say very little about what's going on.
• Such suits inevitably become uncomfortable for all parties, as happened in the recent battle between Apple and Fortnite maker Epic Games.
That's not a compelling point, it's fluff that could be used as padding in a paragraph with actual content.
Using LLMs for de-clickbaiting, de-sensationalizing, de-partisanizing seems like a great application. I want to use it as a personal 'news' reading filter.
If you are a product manager at Apple please stop this bullshit.