A more likely story is cost savings. It's cheaper not to support it, from an assembly and testing point of view.
I just ordered the UV-K5 from Amazon sold by Quansheng and it is labeled as having USB C charging.
There's also a third party seller with an item description of "UV-K6 UV-K5(8)". That listing seems fishy.
I don't see a "UV-K6" listed on the Quansheng web site [1].
EDIT: After more research it looks like the UV-K5(8) is also known as the UV-K6 [2]. I'm curious which model I receive.
[1]: http://en.qsfj.com/products/?series=3
[2]: https://hagensieker.com/2024/03/12/quansheng-uv-k6-radio-rev...
The problem is that it violates the spec by omitting the resistor and you can't charge it with a c to c cable. That's where the frustration comes from.
Sigh, won't buy any electronics that can't just charge USB-C without bs..
https://www.amazon.com/QUANSHENG-UV-K5-Rechargeable-Emergenc...
I don't think that leaves too any ham radio to buy then?