GenAI Detection Tools, Adversarial Techniques, Implications in Higher Education
arxiv.org
arxiv.org
My memory of college essays is that you find your handful of sources, extensively cite them, and you're pretty much done. It's not even the same kind of thing that current LLMs create, because they're not able to pull accurate quotes from articles, books, etc.
1. I cite large chunks of context,
2. I spend money on LLMs that can retain larger contexts
3. I give it my rough drafts like it's my editor
4. I have it prepare alternative treatments, outlines, and beat sheets
5. I ask it to analyze and critique my drafts
6. I critique and revise its drafts
By the time I'm done, I've hit maybe 5 major drafts. The writing is dense, and the voice is mine
These are important skills, and if a writer has them, it does not matter if they work with an editor, coauthor, or an AI. They will get work done, and their writing will meet its objectives. The critical engagement and care - even if assisted by an AI - will always make a work worthwhile.